Monday, March 31, 2008

Bloom's Taxonomy

All right, we're talking Education Theory now.

So, why should you know about Education Theory (especially if you're not studying Education)? Because knowing what you're lecturers/tutors/teachers are thinking about/looking for can help you research and right a better assignment.

Take Bloom's Taxonomy, for example. Most teachers and lecturers know of this list, and most have it in the back of their minds when they're marking your work. The marks you will get will obviously depend on where in the list your work sits.

So what is Bloom's Taxonomy?

It's a list of intellectual processes in order of how much thought is required for each, and it looks like this:
  • Knowledge

  • Comprehension (Understanding)

  • Application (Use)

  • Analysis

  • Synthesis (Creation)

  • Evaluation.

Knowledge (basically, the ability to spout facts and figures), Comprehension and Application are at the "bottom" of the list and are known as the "lower order" skills. Analysis, Synthesis and Evaluation are the "higher order" skills - they show that you can actually think about the information you know, use those thoughts to form ideas and theories and evaluate what you still need to know/think about in order to improve your ideas and theories.

To get the top marks, you need to be able to show all six of these cognitive skills.

For example, if you were writing an essay on the Boer War, you would need to show that you knew the details, then you would need to show that you understood those details and could use them in proper context (say, by connecting information gathered from different sources to discuss things that were happening at the same time). Then you would have to show that you have thought about this information, that you have a theory that you can prove by using this information and that you have the ability to established whether or not the theory has been adequately proven or if it needs more work.

This is why it's important to look at how you handle your quotes in an assignment. I always tell my students that they can't just let a quote stand on its own - they have to comment about it - explain why it was important enough to quote it. This is how you show your higher order skills.

Whenever you quote or paraphrase from another source, you have to add your own thoughts to it. Show how you are analysing the information and using it to prove your argument.

Oh, and always have an argument. Even if you think you're just writing a report and you only have to "tell it like it is", you should still have an argument that you can prove with your information - a central idea that pulls everything together and makes you think about why the information is important in the first place.

Monday, March 17, 2008

Organizing Research with Computers & Avoiding Plagiarism

This page is one of Joe Landberger's Study Guides and Strategies pages.

Organizing Research with Computers & Avoiding Plagiarism is a nice little guide for organising your research and creating a research file.

You might find some useful tips and pointers.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Encyclopaedias - Part Two: "Real" Enyclopaedias

Okay, so we've established that it's probably not a good idea to quote Wikipedia in your assignment.

But what about "real" encyclopaedias? What about Brittanica, Encarta and the rest?

Sadly, they're also on the list of things to avoid in an assignment.

Yes, I know that seems illogical. Sometimes the best information and quotes are in the encyclopaedia entry you found when you first started gathering information. Your lecturers still don't want you to use it.

Why? Well, there are a number of reasons:
  • The information in encyclopaedias is fairly basic, and your lecturers want proof of a deeper level of research and understanding

  • Using encyclopaedias is too easy. Someone else has done all the hard work of information gathering, but your lecturers want you to do that for yourself

  • Tradition - encyclopaedias have never been accepted as a suitable source of information for academic research, so they probably never will

  • Pride - we're too clever to resort to encyclopaedias

So, what should you do about encyclopaedias?

As I suggested in Part One, they do have their place in the research process. Look up your topic in an encyclopaedia to improve your basic knowledge, then use that basic knowledge to inform the rest of your research. You still won't be able to quote that fantastic sentence you found in the encyclopaedia entry, but you could probably use the "further reading" or "sources of information" section at the end of the entry to find something almost as useful.